Solution

Spectr for startups

Early on, the person writing tickets is also the person selling, hiring and answering support. So tickets get written fast, from memory, between other things. Spectr gives that person a draft: import the call, get a spec and stories with acceptance criteria, and spend the ten minutes you have reviewing instead of typing.

No PM means no backlog habit, and it costs you later

The problem is not the missing tickets. It is that the reasoning behind every decision lives in one or two people's heads. Your third engineer joins and has to work out from a Slack search why the data model looks like that. Meanwhile prioritisation defaults to whoever sounds most certain, because checking a claim about what customers keep hitting takes longer than the meeting allows.

What it actually looks like

Seed-stage, five people. The technical founder is also the PM, the support team and half of sales.

Monday
Four customer calls. Granola recorded all of them. Previously: three of the four never turned into anything written down.
Monday 6pm
You import all four as one run. Spectr treats them together and gives each its own share of the budget.
Monday 6pm
Out comes a spec sheet: 11 items, with the two things three of the four customers all mentioned clearly separated from the one-off requests.
Monday 6:20pm
You approve seven, reject three as not-now, and push one to a requirements doc because it is bigger than a ticket.
Wednesday
Sprint planning. Someone argues for a rewrite. The spec already quotes Sentry: 340 occurrences of one error, dated. The rewrite waits.
Month 2
Engineer number three joins and reads the project knowledge base instead of asking you 40 questions.

Three of four customer calls that used to vanish without a written trace have turned into 20 minutes and a reviewed backlog - plus the onboarding doc you never had time to write.

A backlog out of the calls you were having anyway

Customer calls, founder syncs, design reviews - import any of them from Fathom, Granola, Read.ai or Fireflies, or paste a transcript. Spectr pulls out requirements, bugs, decisions and action items and drafts a story for each. Twenty minutes of reviewing instead of two hours of writing.

Prioritise on what is actually happening

Connect PostHog or Sentry and Spectr keeps a read-only view of the errors users hit and the feedback they left, then quotes those figures with a date in the next spec it writes. A claim about what customers keep hitting becomes checkable inside the meeting rather than after it.

The reasoning stops living in one head

Project memory builds up what the product is, how it is built, a glossary and a list of open questions - all from your own meetings, updated as things change. It is the onboarding document nobody has time to write, assembled out of work you were doing anyway.

Free covers a small team properly

The Free plan is five spec sheets a month with two seats and no card. Scope tracking and budget tracking are not tier-gated, so you get both from day one - which matters more early, when one mis-scoped month is a real chunk of runway.

Works with

Frequently asked questions

Is there a free plan?

Yes - five spec sheets a month and two seats, no card required. Starter adds a 30-day free trial on top.

We have no requirements documents at all. Is Spectr still useful?

Yes. Requirement documents can be written from a meeting or from pasted text, which is usually how the first one comes into existence.

Do we need a tracker connected to get value?

No. Specs, stories, requirements and scope tracking all work inside Spectr. A tracker is just where approved stories go once you have one.

How long does setup take?

A few minutes per integration. The thing most worth doing is pinning your docs - a Notion page, a Figma file, a repo - and that is a one-off per project.

See it on your own project

Free plan available - five spec sheets a month, two seats, no card required. 30-day free trial on Starter.

Start for free See pricing

Free plan available. 30-day free trial on Starter.